I have heard it referred to as the “Client Reference” for the project. Each consultant is likely to have their own internal project references/job numbers, but this one must be consistent across all information produced by all the consultants, contractors, and sub-contractors on the project. No change here, the project needs to have a fixed reference, assigned by the appointing party, for all information produced on the project. Let us look at how this new naming system might be used in a bit more detail. This will lead to a much more appropriate naming format to suit different types of projects, including infrastructure projects where volumes and levels didn’t always make sense. Key to making it more flexible, the recommendation of field lengths has also been removed, meaning that each field can be assigned codes that suit the purpose of the project. Project – Originator – Functional Breakdown – Spatial Breakdown – Form – Discipline – Number The updated recommendation gives the following format: The updated guidance in the UK national annexe has become more flexible to help combat this and gives file names that make it easier to understand the content contained within them. Section and Elevation drawings are a good example as they will often span multiple levels. This leaves the Number field as the only way of distinguishing between files.
Often, the number would be adapted to try and group drawings into types or packages, such as 1,000’s for plans, 2,000’s for sections, 3,000’s for elevations and so on.Īs the guidance recommended the use of “ZZ” or “XX” for either multiple zones or levels or no applicable zones and levels, many of the files produced in a project would end up with ZZ or XX in the Volume and Location fields. Which would signify a structural drawing of Zone 2, Level 3 for project 2021 by Symetri. Project – Originator – Volume/System – Level/Location – Type – Role – NumberĪnd gave us file names along the lines of: The previous recommendation followed the format of:
0 kommentar(er)
